High Context Culture vs Low Context Culture Explained
Harvey Feriors
Editor
Published
Modified
Harvey Feriors
Editor
Published
Modified

The context approach is a background on which social interaction happens. The context of the communication is all the aspects of the situation beyond what is explicitly communicated. Edward T. Hall offers a classification of the culture-based context approach in two different communication styles: High context culture and low context culture.
Edward T. Hall classified the high and low context approach based on communication style, especially on the role that context plays in communication and interaction.
Understanding the context approach is important because failure to understand the differences in interaction styles may lead to misunderstanding. For example, in Japan, a high-context culture, negotiators may not just say “No” to what they don’t want. Japanese people tend to say something like “we will get back later.”
Key Points
High context culture is the communication that tends to be implicit and indirect. In high-context cultures, people tend to communicate with nonverbal and subtle situational cues, and a person’s official status, place in society, and reputation carry considerable weight.
Communication in high-context cultures has a stronger reliance on establishing trust between both parties. Establishing trust is important for achieving long-lasting success.
High context culture examples:
China, Japan, South Korea, and the middle east people are considered as a high context cultures.
Low context culture is the communication with explicit patterns (direct and unambiguous). In low context culture, they rely mainly on speaking and writing text to understand. Body language or formal titles are less important here.
Low context culture examples:
North America and Europe are considered as the low context cultures.



